首页> 外文OA文献 >Theory or Attitude? A Comparative Analysis of Turkish Newspaper Articles on Turkish Foreign Policy, June 2008-June 2011
【2h】

Theory or Attitude? A Comparative Analysis of Turkish Newspaper Articles on Turkish Foreign Policy, June 2008-June 2011

机译:理论还是态度? 2008年6月至2011年6月土耳其报纸关于土耳其外交政策的文章比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Turkish Foreign Policy (FP) has seen a paradigmatic transformation. This study presents a comparative analysis of 1535 articles, written by more than a hundred columnists and published in ten Turkish newspapers between June 2008 and June 2011. Results show a strong polarization of opinion such that articles with realist theoretical stance are highly likely to be critical of the Justice and Development Party's (AKP) FP for Turkey, whereas articles with liberal and constructivist theoretical stance are highly likely to have pro-government positioning. In this close association, the question is whether attitude to government policy precedes or follows theoretical stance. Results suggest that newspapers employ mostly whatever theory will support their stance for or against the AKP's new-era FP. In addition, results suggest little attention to Turkey's bid for European Union membership and little attention to world problems outside the Middle East. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
机译:土耳其外交政策(FP)发生了范式转变。这项研究对1535篇文章进行了比较分析,这些文章由100多名专栏作家撰写,并于2008年6月至2011年6月之间在十家土耳其报纸上发表。正义与发展党(FP)在土耳其的FP,而具有自由主义和建构主义理论立场的文章极有可能具有亲政府立场。在这种紧密联系中,问题在于对政府政策的态度是在理论立场之前还是之后。结果表明,报纸主要采用任何理论来支持或反对AKP的新时代FP。此外,结果表明很少关注土耳其申办欧洲联盟,也很少关注中东以外的世界问题。 ©2013泰勒和弗朗西斯集团有限公司版权所有。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gurcan, M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号